E. Jean Carroll files second lawsuit against Trump, accusing him of assault in connection with alleged rape



E. Jean Carroll has filed a second lawsuit against former President Donald Trump. The new lawsuit accuses him of assault and a second act of defamation to deny that he raped her.

Writer E. Jean Carroll introduced a second demand against former President Donald Trump this Thursday, accusing him of assault and defamation.

The second complaint stems from Carroll’s allegation that Trump raped her in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room in the mid-1990s.

Carroll filed the suit shortly after midnight, just as a new law went into effect allowing him to file the complaint decades after the alleged attack. Writing on his Substack, Carroll said he expected the suit to “ruin” Trump’s Thanksgiving.

Roberta Kaplan, one of Carroll’s attorneys, issued a statement to Insider on Thursday, saying her client “seeks to hold Donald Trump accountable not only for defaming her, but for sexually assaulting her, which he did years ago in a Bergdorf dressing room. Goodman.”

Alina Habba, a lawyer for Trump, did not immediately respond to Insider’s request for comment on Thursday.

The former Elle advice columnist first broke the story in an excerpt from her memoir published by New York Magazine in June 2019, when Trump was still president.

When Trump loudly denied the story, saying that he didn’t know Carroll and that she wasn’t even his “type,” Carroll sued him for libel.

Now it’s Carroll file a second claim against Trump for additional comments calling Carroll’s story a “deceit and lie” in October and for the battery. Carroll had previously been unable to sue Trump for the alleged violation itself, because the statute of limitations had expired.

But now he has that power thanks to a New York law which went into effect Thursday, the same day Carroll filed the lawsuit. For a year, the Adult Survivors Act allows the filing of lawsuits for sexual assaults in cases where the statute of limitations has expired.

Carroll has said he met Trump sometime in the fall of 1995 or the spring of 1996 at the Bergdorf Goodman department store on Fifth Avenue in New York City.

After making “playful banter” while helping Trump shop for a girlfriend, the lawsuit says things “took a dark turn” when Trump “forced her against the locker room wall, pinned her with his shoulder and violated”.

Although Carroll did not use the word “rape” in her memoir, she later said it accurately described what happened to her.

In the new lawsuit, Carroll’s lawyers say that the alleged assault caused him “significant pain and suffering, lasting psychological and pecuniary damages, loss of dignity and self-respect and invasion of his privacy.”

“As a result of the pain and suffering caused by Trump’s sexual assault, Carroll has been unable to maintain a romantic relationship since the day Trump raped her. Nor has she had sex with anyone since that time,” says the demand “Carroll has had difficulty trusting men and cannot maintain an intimate relationship. In Carroll’s own words, the ‘music had stopped’ and the ‘lights had gone out’ after Trump attacked him at Bergdorf’s” .

In a Nov. 17 court filing, Carroll’s attorney, Roberta Kaplan, asked that the original defamation case and the second complaint be tried together. Consequently, Kaplan requested that the trial date be extended from February to April 2023.

In the final year of Trump’s presidency, the Department of Justice intervened in the casearguing that federal law protected him from being sued for comments he made while acting as a public servant. President Joe Biden’s DOJ has continued to make this argument.

Judge Lewis A. Kaplan of the Southern District of New York gave the initial ruling to Carroll, saying federal law did not shield Trump. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals initially overturned that ruling, but eventually moved the case to the D.C. Court of Appeals, which will rule on the matter after oral arguments in January.

FAIR-USE COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as citation, syndication, criticism, commenting, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by the copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational, or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
-This article has no negative impact on the original works (It would actually be positive for them).
-This article is also for teaching and inspirational purposes.
– It is not transformative in nature
Source link