Jim Furyk’s impassioned statement curtailed wild speculation about Brooks Koepka and…


The fallout from the 2018 Ryder Cup in Paris proved difficult for the American contingent to handle. Team Europe emerged victorious after a one-sided game ended 17.5 – 10.5 for their team. Additionally, there were reports of a growing rift and possible altercation between golfers following the event. One such incident, between Dustin Johnson and Brooks Koepka, was all but confirmed by Team USA captain Jim Furyk.

ADVERTISING

The article continues below this ad

What happened between Dustin Johnson and Brooks Koepka after the 2018 Ryder Cup loss?

ADVERTISING

The article continues below this ad

The American team arrived as the defending champions at the 2018 Ryder Cup at Le Golf National in Paris. However, the mood was somber for a number of reasons, which sank further after the eventual loss.

Major Championship winners Dustin Johnson and Brooks Koepka were victorious as separate teams in Friday morning’s four balls. However, a change of plans meant the two were paired for four quarters on Saturday afternoon. They lost to the European pair of Henrik Stenson and Justin Rose by a score of 2 and 1.

Jim Furyk says Johnson and Koepka are like ‘brothers’

They did not win the singles matches on Sunday as Team USA was humbled 17.5 – 10.5. However, problems were just beginning to develop. Teammates Johnson and Koepka reportedly got into a heated argument in the European team room, with the former’s partner Paulina Gretzky also at the scene.

US team captain Jim Furyk’s assessment of the incident

In particular, Koepka played downward talk about an argument, denying that it ever happened in the first place. However, Furyk later made contradictory statements, which confirmed the dispute.

ADVERTISING

The article continues below this ad

However, the 52-year-old downplayed the seriousness of the incident. “Whatever started the altercation or whatever happened, it was very brief,” Furyk said said of the confrontation between Johnson and Koepka. “It was very short. Neither of them got anything out of it.”

He also explained the bond between Koepka and Johnson, stating that the two were like “brothers.” “They are like brothers. Brothers can argue, brothers get into it. But they’re as close as they’ve ever been, and it really didn’t have any effect on either of them,” he said. he reiterated.

What do you think of the Koepka-Johnson conflict? Let us know your thoughts in the comments section below.

ADVERTISING

The article continues below this ad

FAIR-USE COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as citation, syndication, criticism, commenting, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by the copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational, or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
-This article has no negative impact on the original works (It would actually be positive for them).
-This article is also for teaching and inspirational purposes.
– It is not transformative in nature
Source link