PSA: Phoebe Dynevor and Andrew Garfield might be dating | ELLE Australia

It’s a good day when two of Britain’s hottest and most eligible bachelors are rumored to be dating. Yes, we’re talking about Bridgerton’s Phoebe Dynevor and Spiderman’s Andrew Garfield, who allegedly got pretty cozy at the GQ Men Of The Year Awards last week, according to an onlooker.

“Andrew and Phoebe clicked straight away, there was an immediate attraction,” said a source The sunof your connection to the event.

“They know each other through various business acquaintances and have a lot in common. “But this is definitely not a one-off meeting. After they left together, they have since met and act like a proper couple.”

The rumor appeared to be bolstered by a series of blind articles submitted to DEUXMOI, with numerous people claiming to have seen the pair leaving the GQ party together, and another claiming to have spotted them together at a bar before the event. “Andrew Garfield and Phoebe Dynevor left the GQ party together…his hand was around her waist, we ship,” read one submission. “Just heard Phoebe Dynevor and Andrew Garfield are dating. Had to tell you,” added another.

DEUXMOI took the liberty of clarifying that the second person did not send the tip because of the first, quelling rumors that people were simply piling on and adding to the surrounding noise. So if the councils are separate, does that increase their legitimacy? No, but it makes us feel a little warmer inside.

Tragically, there’s no photo evidence of the pair together at the beloved event, but considering how they looked individually, we can only imagine they looked like a power couple.

Dynevor appeared in a Victoria Beckham scalloped crop top and crochet skirt, with Gianvito Rossi Georgina and diamond jewellery. Garfield arrived in a Ralph Lauren Purple Label suit, looking incredibly stylish with the all-black ensemble.

If the source is correct, it looks like the two may have spotted something at the event, which is going strong on the (check calendar), a week later. If the rumors are true, it’s still very early days and possibly nothing to get excited about, but tell the millions who are praying there’s a semblance of truth to this talk.

Dyenvor was last romantically linked to famous Hollywood partner Pete Davidson. The pair reportedly started dating in early 2021 and were seen canoeing at Wimbledon in July, but split just a month later due to physical distance issues and scheduling conflicts. “The distance put a strain on the relationship and made it difficult to maintain,” a source said Us Weekly, before adding that the couple “had a great time while they were together.” Two months later, Davidson would kiss Kim Kardashian in an SNL skit and they would continue dating for nine months. Most recently, the comedian has been linked to supermodel Emily Ratajkowski. Dynevor, however, has kept a pretty low profile when it comes to her romantic life and hasn’t been linked to anyone since then… until now.

As for Garfield’s relationship history, he has previously been linked to Emma Stone and Rita Ora, most recently breaking up with his model girlfriend of eight months, Alyssa Miller.

So, considering our two alleged lovebirds are based in Britain, we can assume (if the rumors are true) that they won’t have to deal with the distance too often, pending their work schedules. Does that mean they could make it work in the long run? We can only wait.

For now, though, we should just sit back and wait for anyone to comment on the legitimacy of the rumors.

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as citation, syndication, criticism, commenting, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by the copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational, or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
-This article has no negative impact on the original works (It would actually be positive for them).
-This article is also for teaching and inspirational purposes.
– It is not transformative in nature
Source link